Message boards : BOINC client : RPC_REASON_PROJECT_REQ ... whatfor ???
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 27 Jun 06 Posts: 305 |
WCG makes the attached computers contact the project every now and then, even if the project is out of work and set to no new work for weeks already. Why can a project decide, when my core client makes a contact, even if there is no server interaction required? I don't know yet, wether the core client will respect a suspend, it is the next thing I will try. p.s.: I checked the logs, the WCG contact happened every 4 days : 13-Sep-2008 08:48:49 [World Community Grid] Sending scheduler request: Requested by project. Requesting 0 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks |
Send message Joined: 27 Jun 06 Posts: 305 |
Additional information ... the scheduler reply always contains this : scheduler_version>601</scheduler_version> <master_url>http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/</master_url> <request_delay>61.000000</request_delay> <project_name>World Community Grid</project_name> <next_rpc_delay>345600.000000</next_rpc_delay> 345600 seconds are those 4 days. I hope this turns out to be a server side bug and not to be intentional :-/ |
Send message Joined: 29 Aug 05 Posts: 15556 |
Why can a project decide, when my core client makes a contact, even if there is no server interaction required? Possibly to update your RAC and Credit standings in your BOINC Manager? Or to check if you're up-to-date on all its files? I don't know. Wrong place to ask as well, you best ask this at the WCG forums. They're better equipped to answer that. |
Send message Joined: 27 Jun 06 Posts: 305 |
... Wrong place to ask as well, you best ask this at the WCG forums. They're better equipped to answer that. They might be able to explain why the server sends this tag in a scheduler reply - but here would be the place to make the stock core client immune to such things. I assume that WCG does not do that in order to spy on my computers when I don't expect it, or collect informations that they shouldn't have - but it shows that it is possible. |
Send message Joined: 2 Sep 05 Posts: 103 |
next_rpc_delay was added to the server configuration file in BOINC 5.6, specifically to support low-latency computing (minimum period between scheduler requests to cater for work with tight deadlines). It has other uses; for example, guaranteeing that hosts receive notification within a certain period that a task has to be aborted (useful when a project cancels a batch of workunits with long execution times). And here's the explanation in the WCG presentation at BOINC Workshop 2008 <next_rpc_delay>345600</next_rpc_delay> I've checked the client code and next_rpc_delay will send scheduler requests when the project is suspended. The line which would have prevented that has been commented out with the additional comment: do the RPC even if suspended. There are arguments for the client not sending a project's periodic scheduler request if the project is suspended or set to no new work and has an empty work queue, but the scheduler might be using the feature for something like tracking the number of active hosts. Ideally another setting in the scheduler configuration file would be required to force clients to skip the periodic request when it's unnecessary. "The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world that it leaves to its children." - Dietrich Bonhoeffer |
Send message Joined: 27 Jun 06 Posts: 305 |
Thanks, that helps to understand the intention. This doesn't mean that I like this feature but I can live with it. If it becomes too annoying, I can still detach from the project. |
Copyright © 2024 University of California.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.