5.10.40 x86 / Windows "Longhorn"

Message boards : BOINC Manager : 5.10.40 x86 / Windows "Longhorn"
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2

AuthorMessage
Chris
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Jun 07
Posts: 36
Message 15373 - Posted: 12 Feb 2008, 17:40:49 UTC - in response to Message 15346.  

Increasing the entropy by starting network aktivities may help to get more events at Boincmanager 5.10.40. I run µtorrent, uploading some Linux DVD-Images. I think it would be great if we can set up a Boinc testingserver with dummy workunits/applications on a local network.

@James: The QMC application was compiled using an optimizing Intel-Compiler, therefore it works fine on Intel Quadcore, even on Pentium 4 with Hyperthreading. It doesn't need much of the memory bandwidth. You can check the times for the QMC-WU.
ID: 15373 · Report as offensive
James R. Davis

Send message
Joined: 9 Feb 08
Posts: 3
United States
Message 15374 - Posted: 12 Feb 2008, 17:59:51 UTC - in response to Message 15373.  
Last modified: 12 Feb 2008, 18:02:09 UTC

Increasing the entropy by starting network aktivities may help to get more events at Boincmanager 5.10.40. I run µtorrent, uploading some Linux DVD-Images. I think it would be great if we can set up a Boinc testingserver with dummy workunits/applications on a local network.

@James: The QMC application was compiled using an optimizing Intel-Compiler, therefore it works fine on Intel Quadcore, even on Pentium 4 with Hyperthreading. It doesn't need much of the memory bandwidth. You can check the times for the QMC-WU.


QMC work units are, by far, showing the greatest variance on this quad. Here are four work unit results that show you this variability:

work unit - CPU seconds - Credit granted

3525084 - 76,000 - 55
3502663 - 172,000 - 57
3445846 - 496,999 - 255
3441753 - 518,000 - 207
ID: 15374 · Report as offensive
Nicolas

Send message
Joined: 19 Jan 07
Posts: 1179
Argentina
Message 15375 - Posted: 12 Feb 2008, 21:05:45 UTC - in response to Message 15373.  

I think it would be great if we can set up a Boinc testingserver with dummy workunits/applications on a local network.

Get me ssh access to one of your Linux machines and I'll make you one :)

ID: 15375 · Report as offensive
Chris
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Jun 07
Posts: 36
Message 15428 - Posted: 14 Feb 2008, 21:48:46 UTC - in response to Message 15374.  

QMC work units are, by far, showing the greatest variance on this quad. Here are four work unit results that show you this variability:


Do you work often with large, memory-intensive software while running Boinc?
You can try projects with smaller applications, like Spinhenge or SHA-1 Collision Search.
ID: 15428 · Report as offensive
Profile KSMarksPsych
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 05
Posts: 1239
United States
Message 15439 - Posted: 15 Feb 2008, 14:18:26 UTC - in response to Message 15374.  

QMC work units are, by far, showing the greatest variance on this quad. Here are four work unit results that show you this variability:

work unit - CPU seconds - Credit granted

3525084 - 76,000 - 55
3502663 - 172,000 - 57
3445846 - 496,999 - 255
3441753 - 518,000 - 207



QMC crunch times depend on the particular work unit. They're not uniform.
Kathryn :o)
ID: 15439 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2

Message boards : BOINC Manager : 5.10.40 x86 / Windows "Longhorn"

Copyright © 2024 University of California.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.