Posts by kgets

1) Message boards : Projects : SETI (Message 77891)
Posted 15 May 2017 by kgets
Post:
Uh... it's all data that has been captured by ... ahem... via EM. Nothing new there.
2) Message boards : Projects : SETI (Message 77887)
Posted 14 May 2017 by kgets
Post:
SETI assumes that "intelligent" life communicates using the electromagnetic spectrum. SETI searches using radio telescopes to "listen" for narrow bandwidth radio transmissions. Do you really think that if humans are stuck in the electromagnetic medium (EM)... that every other life form in the universe is also stuck in EM medium?

Have the people at SETI ever considered that other transmission mediums might also be used other than EM?

Has Seth Shostak ever considered that EM might be an archaic communication medium. Maybe ET's communicate using other energy forms. I think your radio telescopes are like using smoke signals compared to ET technology.


Just my sincere and respectful opinion.
3) Message boards : Projects : SETI might be a was of CPU time (Message 68260)
Posted 12 Mar 2016 by kgets
Post:
They are blocking my posts.
4) Message boards : Projects : SETI might be a was of CPU time (Message 68259)
Posted 12 Mar 2016 by kgets
Post:
Here's a thought! We are all familiar with red shift and blue shift as it applies to "light". So SETI is searching in a narrow EM band of say "x", and if an entity in space is transmitting EM at "x"... but going away from SETI detector... what do you think will happen to the wavelength of that EM transmission? I'll bet SETI won't detect it because.... of red shift.
5) Message boards : Projects : SETI might be a was of CPU time (Message 68258)
Posted 12 Mar 2016 by kgets
Post:
Blocking my posts is biased. You let people throw flame at me but when I defend myself you block MY posts. You are a typical liberal Mr/Ms Ageless.
6) Message boards : Projects : SETI might be a was of CPU time (Message 68257)
Posted 12 Mar 2016 by kgets
Post:
In fact if you look through the threads... I was the one who was attacked based upon a simple comment about other communication mediums. So who is throwing flame? I have the right to defend my self.
7) Message boards : Projects : SETI might be a was of CPU time (Message 68236)
Posted 12 Mar 2016 by kgets
Post:
==> It sounds like you're implying you know better then {than} anyone here. Please pick some information that Dr Korpela or other respected Seti staff has published and go at it.

You're implying that "I'm implying". All I did was suggest other communication medium, other ideas -- I DID NOT SAY ANYONE WAS WRONG. Check the threads and you cannot find where I said anyone was wrong. For that you say I know better than anyone else?

Your responses indicate that you are offended that some perceived lay person DARE suggest other options to the PhD's that do research. You sound very frustrated and cannot take debate very well. I think anyone who counters a researcher findings... that researcher becomes offended because their expertise is now placed in doubt.
8) Message boards : Projects : SETI might be a was of CPU time (Message 68095)
Posted 3 Mar 2016 by kgets
Post:
You make me sound like a government agent trying infiltrate the SETI clan... and I am here to destroy you. (maniacal laugh insert here).

The arrogance of the human race! PhD's on TV waving their arms and University Professors lecturing their finding's.

You were not born with all knowledge... as humans you have to "learn it" and suffer everyday knowing --- YOU DON'T KNOW IT ALL. Even the information you publish in "accepted journals" as the permanent fact... is temporary because someone can come along and still prove you wrong.
9) Message boards : Projects : SETI might be a was of CPU time (Message 68094)
Posted 3 Mar 2016 by kgets
Post:
In Summation: Apparently you take my words in the wrong tone. I promise you I'm not being arrogant. I cannot name the communication medium that SETI should be using. I say... there might be a different communication medium "we humans" do not know because we are not that advanced. I think SETI is in EM medium, whilst the "Aliens" are in a different medium. I seriously mean no harm or aggravation.

Next, you don't know my degree nor the field within which I work. I can promise you that I graduated from an Accredited University with at least a Bachelor Of Science. I will not state any higher education... I'm not here to brag, put down, or isolate.

We have advanced very far in the last 50 years. I suspect we are elementary students in a universe with Aliens far past PhD's --- if the analogy makes sense.
10) Message boards : Projects : SETI might be a was of CPU time (Message 68081)
Posted 2 Mar 2016 by kgets
Post:
Read a physics book? Have you ever considered that maybe we don't know all the laws of physics? Humans with PhD's think they know everything and when they don't --- they simply create a new Constant to get their idea to float.

The Ocean is full of untapped life forms we have never seen and presently they are discovering new creatures.

I suspect we don't know all the laws of physics and maybe there are other laws in the universe Aliens know that we don't. I think my comments are valid and they should be considered with an open mind.

I think SETI has good intentions but I seriously think SETI is looking in the wrong place. I think Aliens can purposely hid their communication from us.

But there is the notion that there are other races like us still using EM medium to communicate and maybe SETI is looking for races on other planets like us, and not super intelligent Aliens.

Regarding the tin hat or foil hat. That is a low blow.
11) Message boards : Projects : SETI might be a was of CPU time (Message 68080)
Posted 2 Mar 2016 by kgets
Post:
Dissension bothers you? I thought my comments were to invoke other path or ides-- free speech. Just because you do not like my opinion does not mean I am being a trouble maker. You sound like a typical arrogant PhD that if you are countered, you take it personally.

I still think and believe SETI is searching the wrong medium and I simply suggested a different medium.
12) Message boards : Projects : SETI might be a was of CPU time (Message 68045)
Posted 28 Feb 2016 by kgets
Post:
It's documented that Aliens can travel from point A to B without too much delay. It has been suggested they can [focus] "their technological engine" toward a point in space and "pull" themselves toward their destination, which can be many light years away, and arrive there almost instantaneously. If they wanted to communicate with us, they could simply put an outpost near mars and TX RX with no problem. I think Bob Lazar described such an engine.

For those of you who say Bob is a con artist, I have this to say. Assume his story is true. If he was killed shortly after his story, his death would be suspicious and it would give his story great credibility. Rather the government ignored him and his story is still in doubt. I think Bob is legit.

Lastly, I suspect that Aliens will pick and choose who they want to communicate with. I also believe that they have the technology to "block" any other outside transmissions to Earth they deem unfit. So therefore I tend to believe that SETI has good intentions, but I think it's a waste of CPU time. I have never heard fo anything significant come from SETI. Anybody can find patterns in random noise, publish a paper, and call it evidence.
13) Message boards : Projects : SETI might be a was of CPU time (Message 68033)
Posted 27 Feb 2016 by kgets
Post:
SETI assumes that "intelligent" life communicates using the electromagnetic spectrum. SETI searches using radio telescopes to "listen" for narrow bandwidth radio transmissions. Do you really think that if humans are stuck in the electromagnetic medium (EM)... that every life form in the universe is also stuck in EM medium?

Have the people at SETI ever considered that other transmission mediums might also be used rather than EM?

Evidence exists that Aliens who have abducted or communicated with humans do so using telepathy. To communicate long distances through space, there may be a "side-band" in the gravitation waves that allow transmission WE CANNOT DETECT.



Copyright © 2024 University of California.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.