Posts by CM

21) Message boards : Teams : Team Gridcoin - Rewarding BOINC computation (Message 71189)
Posted 4 Aug 2016 by Profile CM
Post:
We've begun holding regular Gridcoin community hangouts (on mumble), tune in!

Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/gridcoin-community-hangouts/

Next hangout: https://steemit.com/gridcoin/@cm-steem/gridcoin-hangout-002-rsvp-and-suggest-topics
22) Message boards : Promotion : Gridcoin community hangouts - Discuss BOINC & Cryptocurrency. (Message 71188)
Posted 4 Aug 2016 by Profile CM
Post:
Hey,

I've begun organising regular Gridcoin community hangouts where we talk about BOINC, Gridcoin and cryptocurrency.

I'd really appreciate attendance from BOINC community members, especially for talking about BOINC subjects (Funding, roadmap, 4th gen BOINC credit system, etc).

Next hangout: https://steemit.com/gridcoin/@cm-steem/gridcoin-hangout-002-rsvp-and-suggest-topics

First hangout: https://soundcloud.com/gridcoin-community-hangouts/gridcoin-hangout-001

Thanks,
CM.
23) Message boards : Questions and problems : [Discussion] 4th Generation BOINC credit system (Message 71174)
Posted 3 Aug 2016 by Profile CM
Post:
I couldn't make it to the Hangout. Are there some minutes from the discussion?

The hangout has been uploaded to soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/gridcoin-community-hangouts/gridcoin-hangout-001

The 4th gen BOINC credit system was the first topic of discussion (First 20 mins), basically summing up the topic for our community.

Here's a list of topics discussed: https://steemit.com/gridcoin/@erkan/topic-voting-for-gridcoin-hangout-001#@erkan/re-erkan-topic-voting-for-gridcoin-hangout-001-20160729t114852991z

The highest voted topics were prioritised in the hangout, so that's a guide to what was discussed.

I'll schedule another hangout and keep you noted.

Edit: A second hangout has now been scheduled: https://steemit.com/gridcoin/@cm-steem/gridcoin-hangout-002-rsvp-and-suggest-topics
24) Message boards : Questions and problems : [Discussion] 4th Generation BOINC credit system (Message 71065)
Posted 28 Jul 2016 by Profile CM
Post:
To anyone interested, the Gridcoin community is holding a Gridcoin Hangout on BeyondBitcoin's mumble server on Saturday 30th. The 4th generation BOINC credit system will be one of the topics discussed, I'd really appreciate it if BOINC community members could attend. Cheers :)

https://steemit.com/beyondbitcoin/@cm-steem/gridcoin-hangout-001-rsvp-and-suggest-topics
25) Message boards : Questions and problems : Project SSL Certifications (Message 70949)
Posted 20 Jul 2016 by Profile CM
Post:
*bump*

Many of these projects have yet to respond to the SSL threads.

Several of these projects may be up for removal from the Gridcoin whitelist:
https://cryptocointalk.com/topic/29841-discussion-boinc-whitelist-monitoring/page-32#entry220005
26) Message boards : Projects : Volunteer Computing security and privacy of volunteers' machines study (Message 70153)
Posted 13 Jun 2016 by Profile CM
Post:
It'd be cool if the survey was checkboxes instead of radio buttons.

It'd be neat to see a BOINC environment setup on projectatomic: http://www.projectatomic.io/
27) Message boards : Questions and problems : Intel Xeon Phi Coprocessor (Message 70152)
Posted 13 Jun 2016 by Profile CM
Post:
Someone else interested in xeon phis: https://boincstats.com/en/forum/15/10889,1
28) Message boards : Teams : Looking for a Team or Teams (Message 70151)
Posted 13 Jun 2016 by Profile CM
Post:
Alternatively, team Gridcoin rewards their users: https://boinc.berkeley.edu/dev/forum_thread.php?id=10952
29) Message boards : Projects : DrugDiscovery@home revival (Message 70150)
Posted 13 Jun 2016 by Profile CM
Post:
As some ideas on getting more volunteers we consider giving to volunteers something like Ethereum-based tokens.


Would you consider applying for whitelist status in the Gridcoin cryptocurrency system? https://www.gridcoin.us https://cryptocointalk.com/topic/29841-discussion-boinc-whitelist-monitoring/page-31
30) Message boards : Questions and problems : [Discussion] 4th Generation BOINC credit system (Message 69867)
Posted 31 May 2016 by Profile CM
Post:
These forums are for discussion of anything that goes about BOINC. No discussion is ever set in stone about its direction, so if the direction deviates somewhat to the left or right, fine. Eventually it'll always comes back on topic.

If you do not like what others say in the discussion, or if someone's opinion differs so much from yours, you don't go calling them a troll. If you truly cannot get over what they say, put them on ignore. The option is available in the forum preferences. That way their posts are hidden from your view, you don't have to worry about what they say anymore, and you don't have to go call them names for absolutely no reason.

Cool, permission to maintain going off topic granted! It's somewhat fair to categorize Egilman's posts as trolling though considering he doesn't acknowledge answers to his questions, but fair enough after this post I'll cease namecalling, it was quite crass of me.

When you need to insult/abuse your critics to defend your position from serious criticism.

Usually there is something funny (crooked) going on in the background.

What insult? Cheekily implying that you're a cheater for defending cheating? Or implying that failing to acknowledge previous answers/responses to your questions/posts (in this thread and the 'monetization' thread) somewhat constitutes trolling?


Let me ask a question. if this is so great, why not take the open source boinc platform and devise you own crunching system and leave boinc out of it?

Why the need to take over the platform?

What specificity are you referring to by 'this'? The general concept of a 4th gen credit system?

According to the BOINC project governance model, decisions are based on community consensus & and disputes are decided upon by the PMC. https://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/wiki/ProjectGovernance

Simply put there is no reason to fork BOINC at this point (nor should there be), the concept of a 4th gen credit system has not been defined never-mind there being a community breaking lack of consensus on the matter.

Your opposition to further development/improvement of the credit system has been noted & should be taken into account in the future (to maintain fair community consensus). How community consensus is measured would be an interesting side-topic.


And yes there are programmers what will cheat any system you can devise. I mean Moore's law? you obviously have some smarts.

Windows ring a bell? they have been trying to lock windows down since they first wrote it, but every time they release a new version, the next day a hacked version is available on the undernet. The millions they pay for security and it's hacked before it is even released.

Your analogy of Moore's law to cheating a credit system makes little sense, computers are getting more powerful every year thus BOINC cheating will always occur? Poor analogy.

Windows is one of the most successful brands of operating systems on the market. Of course they have been fighting a continuous battle against vulnerabilities in their operating systems (all popular software is subject to continuous attack). Had Microsoft never patched any of the publicly exposed vulnerabilities their operating systems would not nearly have the same market share they currently hold & Microsoft would likely not be the same company it is today.

Simply because new vulnerabilities/issues may present themselves in the future doesn't mean that existing vulnerabilities/issues (that are public knowledge) should be ignored/maintained. Stagnation is never the solution to security flaws.


There is no absolutely secure boinc. A pipe dream all your trying to do is get boinc dev to work with you in your money making scheme.

You're right that there is no absolutely secure BOINC - there will always exist flaws in software (past/present/future) that will be taken advantage of by malicious actors, but using that as an excuse not to take positive action against their existence doesn't make sense.

What's wrong with interacting with the BOINC community/developers? Do you wish for this to not be an open community? Many of the users that have expressed their views in this thread have zero affiliation with Gridcoin yet share somewhat similar views that a 4th gen credit system could be a good idea (we have yet to reach consensus on it's definition).


You will lose the boinc community and you will never get them back

What makes you say this? At this point, our team/software has yet to reach the majority of the BOINC community.


More importantly you will lose the reasearchers, as they will take the open source platform and develop their own.

I thought that you wished for us to develop our own fork of BOINC, now you wish for researchers themselves to fork their own BOINC platform?

The vast majority of BOINC users don't care about the credit system, only a small percentage do, so I doubt that a mass exodus would occur. If it did, it would be great publicity for BOINC & volunteer computing.


Does any one forget what happened to the medical program when the rumor hit that they were for profit? it took them years to get their reputation and crunchers back.

Got a link to a thread on this? What project was this? Do you oppose any company that runs a BOINC project that isn't expressly non-profit? IBM is a for-profit company yet their WCG project is one of the most popular BOINC projects.


But just remember, if you really were altruistic and just trying to get the little guy some power deferment, why cite the current value of gridcoin? and it's potential?

I cited the value of Gridcoin as a response to your post where you implied that Gridcoin was "making a few people wealthy beyond the dreams of avarice"; Avarice - one of the '7 deadly sins' being incapable of dreaming about a marketcap 0.025% of Bitcoin's marketcap is a bit far fetched.


You guys are in it for the bucks.

Your whole response and each insult nails that home.

My views/posts are that of my own and do not represent the entire Gridcoin community.
31) Message boards : Questions and problems : [Discussion] 4th Generation BOINC credit system (Message 69837)
Posted 31 May 2016 by Profile CM
Post:

Now, with Gridcoin, your adding a financial incentive to cheat to the mix and want to change the whole credit paradigm to solve that for one specific groups advantage.

I say eliminate Gridcoin from boinc. That removes the financial incentive to cheat which will only make the problem worse. At the very least eliminate paying for crunch with bitcoin in any way.

Cheating was already present due to inner/inter team competition, do you also propose to ban charityengine and any team that offers prizes for BOINC computation?

Improving the credit system does not solve issues that only affect a single group - cheating affects all BOINC users/teams. If a new credit system was devised, it wouldn't be forced upon all projects - projects can chose what credit system to implement (there is no centralized control over BOINC projects), and several may not upgrade simply due to project inactivity or may be unwilling to upgrade due to perceiving it as unnecessary server maintenance.

Due to a lack of centralized power, you cannot eliminate Gridcoin from BOINC. You could campaign for each BOINC project admin to ban/delete team 'Gridcoin', but it's highly unlikely that many project owners will intentionally drive computing power away from their projects just to entertain a single troll.


This is how Gridcoin has grown to be the largest boinc team is by greed.
and yeah I am a member on the Gridcoin site and have seen how the creaters of gridcoin have the full intent to take over boinc and use it to their own ends.
First by becoming the dominant team in Bionc, and them monetizing boinc.

Your misinformation is based on a single cherry-picked forum post; I've already covered this topic: https://boinc.berkeley.edu/dev/forum_thread.php?id=10794&postid=68948 (Note that the current poll shows a majority of users wish to vote on the mandatory team requirement)

If BOINC was to transition to a 4th gen credit system or if we can work out how to eliminate cheating, the team requirement removal would only be a matter of managing a scalable solution on the blockchain (increasing neural network registration from 2k to 100k+) instead of for providing security from cheaters. Thusly, Gridcoin would no longer be a one team crypto, but rather a crypto for the entire BOINC community.


And lets not forget the profit in bitcoins of any type are based upon value/demand. More demand higher value. By completely monetizing Boinc, they create huge demand for their currency thereby increasing the value of the bitcoin they already hold. sure they pay a few sheckles out to the crunchers but that is far far far less than the value/demand they are creating. Which makes the gridcoin creators even more wealthy.
[...]
Greed has driven Gridcoin to the great recruiting levels they have attained. greed is driving this initiative to adjust credit. and the only ones that benefit is the founders of gridcoin.

I hold no Bitcoin; it is only used as a trading pair on exchanges - bitcoin is not utilised at all within the gridcoin system.

I don't think wishing to offset some of the electricity costs racked up by BOINC computation is greedy, and the founders of gridcoin are not the only ones to benefit from it continuing to exist (There's no supply cap, in 10+ years the current supply will be a minority compared to the sum of newly generated coins. Not to mention the fact that there was no instant/pre-mine; all existing GRC represents past BOINC computation).


So answer me a question?

WHY would Boinc want to get involved directly with making a few people wealthy beyond the dreams of avarice when the original intent was to volunteer for science?

BOINC is not involved in neither Gridcoin's development nor community (as far as I'm aware, there may be several anon BOINC devs in our community).

The BOINC platform/software is not dedicated solely to science, nor is it mandatory that projects must have a scientific purpose; there are several non-scientific BOINC projects currently - do you oppose their existence too?

Regarding people becoming wealthy 'beyond the dreams of avarice', thats rather far fetched considering Gridcoin currently is worth (1/4030=0.025%) the value of Bitcoin.


Cheating has been going on since the moment distributing computing was formed. And will continue despite your best efforts to stop it. and that is simply to stay on top of a leaderboard. Much less being paid to be on top of that board.

Are you justifying the existence of cheating purely based on its presence in the past? Your second sentence reads like a threat, are you upset that you or your team members will no longer be able to fraudulently claim a high leaderboard position?

Surely if we can identify solutions to cheating, their implementation would be beneficial to the entire BOINC community? Whilst it may be a cat&mouse game, why should we not oppose cheaters? Do you take the same view on computer security updates (considering it's a similar never-ending cat&mouse game).


I say leave it alone, and eliminate pay for production from boinc. Remove greed as an incentive for crunching.

The scientific community will love ya for it as will most of the organized teams out there.

As I've stated above, censorship/oppression of communities based on their purpose is unlikely to occur.

Please stay on topic of the 4th gen credit system instead of derailing the topic towards gridcoin.

To those reading: Sorry for having to reply to this post (went off topic myself).
32) Message boards : Teams : Team Gridcoin - Rewarding BOINC computation (Message 69806)
Posted 30 May 2016 by Profile CM
Post:
Gridcoin has been added to BitSquare https://github.com/bitsquare/bitsquare/releases/tag/v0.4.8
33) Message boards : Projects : BitcoinUtopia charging 100% fees (for admins personal profit) (Message 69628)
Posted 16 May 2016 by Profile CM
Post:
BitcoinUtopia has begun charging 100% fees from all BU miners for personal profit!

The BU admin's personal finance situation has been in disarray for a while now. http://www.bitcoinutopia.net/bitcoinutopia/forum_thread.php?id=924&postid=11067

For what purpose does this serve when BU has been funded for a full year? http://www.bitcoinutopia.com/2015/10/bitcoin-utopia/

The personal profit campaign results in a 404 page on the bitcoinutopia server page: http://www.bitcoinutopia.com/2016/04/bitcoin-utopia-part-4/

The correct campaign url is: http://www.bitcoinutopia.com/2016/05/bitcoin-utopia-part-4/

Note that in the campaign further down the page, the fee is listed as 0% for BU.

I'm proposing to remove BitcoinUtopia from Gridcoin's whitelist: https://cryptocointalk.com/topic/29841-discussion-boinc-whitelist-monitoring/?p=214803

Please remove your Bitcoin miners for the time being.


YOU have caused NOTHING but problems at Bitcoin Utopia and yet YOU have zero credits there!!! What gives you the RIGHT to come in and demand fricking changes to a system y9u ADMITTEDLY know NOTHING about!!! You did NOT come the Bitcoin Utopia asking 'questions' you came in THREATENING to 'whitelist' it at GridCoin which is where YOU are from!! YOU do have and ulterior motive here, YOU 'CM' or 'GC' or whatever the heck your 'real' name is have asked questions, 99% of which have been answered, some even by the Admin in charge and yet you STILL are not satisfied!!! YOU have even caused changes to be made in the Forums, prior to YOUR postings ANYONE could post there, now NO ONE CAN POST in ANY forum, until some controls are put in to stop people like you from taking over ALL the forums!!! I would say that if you don't like the way Bitcoin Utopia is running Campaign #7 then DON'T RUN IT, but you don't crunch there AT ALL!!! Bitcoin Utopia ALSO told you to go ahead and 'whitelist' it at GridCoin, obviously that FAILED miserably and now you have come HERE spewing your filth and hate!!

When I click on your name I see you have ZERO credits in ANY Boinc Project, if you don't like the way things are being here at Boinc GO AWAY!!!

I caused no problems at BU - I asked questions regarding the admin's 'for-profit' motives since the Gridcoin system rewards its users based on contributions to individual projects & the category of 'commercial/for-profit projects' has previously been argued potentially not appropriate to have a whitelist status.

The forums were indeed deleted, but I am not to blame: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.distributed.boinc.user/5523 (Note: I am not 'Nicolás').

You should note that this thread's original post's timestamp is the same time as my original post on the BU campaign 7 part 4 thread (Though you can't verify that on BU's side now), I didn't create this after Henri's response as if I still had unanswered/unsatisfied questions but rather created it alongside my original tangent.

Several users did indeed verbally express they don't care about the project's whitelist status, and Henri acknowledged my intention to vote on the whitelist status in my original post. I didn't create the poll due to the situation being cleared up, but BU regressing by deleting/disabling their message boards may bring it back on the table.

Fair enough, I totally steamrolled through the campaign 7 part 4 thread misinformed, the news/announcement for the campaign does at a first glance come across as arrogant like "This campaign is for profit, deal with it." especially since it's opt-out not opt-in.

Campaign #7 - Part 4
I am now updating Campaign #7 for raising 2000 EUR for Consultum Finland Oy (Bitcoin Utopia). This is to make profit. You can continue crunching or abort WUs...

Henri.


Had I been absolutely intolerable on BU's forums, Henri (or any admin/mod) could have banned/deleted my account, deleted my posts, enabled a minimum RAC to post or if spam advert posts were an issue a captcha could have been created. Henri did not ask the boinc_project mailing list how to do this though, he instead chose to delete/disable the message boards overall for an undisclosed reason.

I demanded no changes from BU (aside from fixing broken hyperlinks on the website), I have indeed created a '4th gen credit' thread on this message board which has become quite an active thread; 5+ years of not discussing the state of the credit system leads to a worthwhile discussion, but that thread is not a 'demand' rather a healthy community discussion.

Who cares who I am, or what my RAC is? There are no rules requiring myself to publicly disclose my real identity nor link my BOINC computation to my forum accounts. I'll not be chased away from a forum just because I rustled the jimmies of a few users from an evidently unstable project, if anything it motivates me to return here.

Edit: The message boards are back up.

Edit: The following threads have been censored locked:
http://www.bitcoinutopia.net/bitcoinutopia/forum_thread.php?id=1052
http://www.bitcoinutopia.net/bitcoinutopia/forum_thread.php?id=970
http://www.bitcoinutopia.net/bitcoinutopia/forum_thread.php?id=924
34) Message boards : Projects : BitcoinUtopia charging 100% fees (for admins personal profit) (Message 69613)
Posted 15 May 2016 by Profile CM
Post:
Right. In the past the project took a % cut of each campaign, to fund their overhead. Now they separated the overhead support, from the campaign support completely. Crunch for a campaign 100%, and/or crunch for the overhead. Completely your choice. Nothing nefarious here, and more controllable by the volunteers.

If you agree, it would be nice to have the subject of this thread changed to something more accurate and less misleading.

We could change the topic to something along the lines of "BitcoinUtopia raises default fees & disables message boards".

Have a look: http://www.bitcoinutopia.net/bitcoinutopia/forum_index.php

Guess he can't handle having his 'for-profit' motives questioned? There was no spam on the forum, so I don't see the point in disabling the BU message boards.
35) Message boards : BOINC client : boinccmd --join_acct_mgr got error (Message 69586)
Posted 13 May 2016 by Profile CM
Post:
yes, i put sudo before the command.

If your password has a space in it, it won't work in the command line (lol).
36) Message boards : Projects : Announcing BMG@Home - Seeking Testers & Volunteers for Bulk Metallic Glass Simulations! (Message 69577)
Posted 13 May 2016 by Profile CM
Post:
No work and site is down.
Dead project

That was fast! D:
37) Message boards : Questions and problems : [Discussion] 4th Generation BOINC credit system (Message 69528)
Posted 9 May 2016 by Profile CM
Post:
Quoted from mikey (message 69486):
You're right, the BOINC credit system doesn't have any responsibility to change its system(s) to suit the needs of Gridcoin; it does however have a responsibility to continue improving/developing its system(s) to address the needs of BOINC users/projects as a whole.


Is there any BOINC development funding any more? I thought that ended recently?

My previous post was rather inaccurate/arrogant, there are no enforced responsibilities to continue any BOINC development, since funding has ended it's entirely up to volunteers to continue development.

The project governance page states (https://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/wiki/ProjectGovernance):

[...]
People who consistently contribute are able to participate in the project's decision-making processes.
[...]
Project decisions are generally made by community consensus. To manage this process, and to resolve conflicts when they occur, there is a Project Management Committee (PMC) consisting of community members who have consistently contributed to the project.
[...]

So any actual decision to focus on development of a 4th gen credit system is largely in the hands of active BOINC devs and the Project Management Committee.

The governance model change announcement (https://boinc.berkeley.edu/dev/forum_thread.php?id=10370&postid=62905) states:

BOINC's funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation has ended,
at least for the time being.
[...]
However, any new development and major bug fixes to BOINC will need to be done by volunteer programmers.
I'm confident that the BOINC community will meet the challenge.
[...]

So yes, US NSF funding ended. It doesn't appear that the raised/promised SETI funds (http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/21/science/yuri-milner-russian-entrepreneur-promises-100-million-for-alien-search.html?_r=0) have been allocated to BOINC development, nor is there sponsorship by large companies running BOINC projects (WCG is IBM).

I proposed using Gridcoin (foundation funds) to fund development on a tip4commit basis (forking peer4commit for best initial compatibility https://github.com/sigmike/peer4commit) in the BOINC github issues section (https://github.com/BOINC/boinc/issues/1493).

Christian Beer's comment (https://github.com/BOINC/boinc/issues/1493#issuecomment-211246173) does raise some important questions - ultimately a tip4commit system would place an individual (the fundraiser) in a centralized position of power (https://peer4commit.com/faq) which is somewhat incompatible with the existing project governance model. If there is a trusted treasury within the PMC, they could accept direct GRC/<any crypto> donations instead of relying on a tip4commit system.
38) Message boards : Questions and problems : [Discussion] 4th Generation BOINC credit system (Message 69516)
Posted 8 May 2016 by Profile CM
Post:
I'm sorry. I have to laugh at this discussion. Why volunteer our time crunching projects with the Boinc software when one can volunteer and get paid too! LOL I see two choices here. Fix the credit system so all projects pay the same and extend the reward system of getting paid to all teams......or.....ban Gridcoin from Boinc teams. I heard the taxman is curious about this and is looking into Gridcoin paying people and also looking into pulling the non-profit status from Boinc in general. Hope you have fun with the red tape thanks to a team like Gridcoin.

I don't think anyone is proposing that all projects should reward equal quantities of credit; inter-project credit comparison is a flawed comparison. Inner-project credit comparison is what's important.

Ban Gridcoin? Going to ban charityengine and any sponsored BOINC competitions too? How would you enforce this across 30+ projects?

Got a source on your tax claim? Generally it is the responsibility of end-users to pay tax on crypto earnings according to the tax laws implemented in their geographical area - tax mostly doesn't apply until you spend it (VAT/CGT) or when you convert it from crypto to fiat.

Does BOINC operate under a non-profit company? I don't see any FAQ stating this, only the fact that the software is distributed with the Lesser General Public License (LGPL)? Besides, it's not BOINC distributing earnings it's a 3rd party. Though if you've got proof of this please do share.

Are you equally opposed to commercial BOINC projects making a profit from volunteer computation? Bitcoin Utopia is a commercial project, are you proposing to ban BU too?
39) Message boards : Projects : BitcoinUtopia charging 100% fees (for admins personal profit) (Message 69510)
Posted 8 May 2016 by Profile CM
Post:
Quite the learning experience that thread, so turns out the fee structure of Bitcoin Utopia has changed. New campaigns will have 0% fees, and there's one campaign with 100% fees dedicated to funding the Bitcoin Utopia webite (and for profit on top of expenses).

The campaign to fund BU is enabled by default but can be manually de-activated, so no need to panic.
40) Message boards : Projects : BitcoinUtopia charging 100% fees (for admins personal profit) (Message 69506)
Posted 7 May 2016 by Profile CM
Post:
BitcoinUtopia has begun charging 100% fees from all BU miners for personal profit!

The BU admin's personal finance situation has been in disarray for a while now. http://www.bitcoinutopia.net/bitcoinutopia/forum_thread.php?id=924&postid=11067

For what purpose does this serve when BU has been funded for a full year? http://www.bitcoinutopia.com/2015/10/bitcoin-utopia/

The personal profit campaign results in a 404 page on the bitcoinutopia server page: http://www.bitcoinutopia.com/2016/04/bitcoin-utopia-part-4/

The correct campaign url is: http://www.bitcoinutopia.com/2016/05/bitcoin-utopia-part-4/

Note that in the campaign further down the page, the fee is listed as 0% for BU.

I'm proposing to remove BitcoinUtopia from Gridcoin's whitelist: https://cryptocointalk.com/topic/29841-discussion-boinc-whitelist-monitoring/?p=214803

Please remove your Bitcoin miners for the time being.


Previous 20 · Next 20

Copyright © 2024 University of California.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.