Posts by hangya2

InfoMessage
1) Message boards : Projects : Bitcoin Utopia not science project
Message 55824
Posted 6 Sep 2014 by hangya2
One word ---> LOL!

(I even DID IT IN CAPITAL LETTERS for you)

;)


yeah, I know...

funny, how there is no place on the net where we can put our collective mental disorders behind us, and just get along on some good topic =)

EDIT:
when I was contributing the most, my power bill was like 35$/month higher then usual...
that is 420$/year just for crunching, and my rig was not even that elite...
For a 3 year period that is 800$ (gear) + 1260$ power = 2060$ for upper medium gear...

now, assume 500 crunchers: 500*2060=1.030.000$ in case of 24/7 contribution...

1 million dollars contributed by 500 crunchers over 3 years...

SOME ADDITIONAL STATS :D (not atypical numbers)
GPUGRID:
Short runs (2-3 hours on fastest card) 572 users
Long runs (8-12 hours on fastest card) 484 users

POEM:
POEM++ (cpu work units) 1,880 users
POEM++ OpenCL 315 users

so, assume 35$ more in power bill for 500 + 1800 users, and 3 years:
2300*35$*12*3=2.898.000$ power bill for medium hardware...
2) Message boards : Projects : Bitcoin Utopia not science project
Message 55822
Posted 6 Sep 2014 by hangya2
I personally feel that my equipment is no longer wanted or needed in the Boinc projects


I agree completely. GPUs have made my CPU-based contribution virtually worthless for a lot of projects. They are too old to accept decent GPUs, so now when they die I don't bother to repair them, I just throw them away. My single bottom-of-the-range GPU does as much work as most of the rest of my CPU-only machines put together. Depressing, isn't it? I'm just not interested enough to invest any money in a 'decent' machine (most of my stuff is $20 junk, my last couple of machines were free). On the bright side though if more work is being done by GPUs (even if not by me) that's got to be a Good Thing.


YOU ARE MISSING THE POINT !!!!!
Credit is meant to be in proportion to the DRYSTONE/WHETSTONE rate of a device...
The actual indisputable truth is that the GPU:s are a LOT faster then CPU:s, and that is why they get more credit...
THIS IS SCIENTIFICALLY INDISPUTABLE!!!
TOOLS GET OBSOLETE!!!!

The problem with Bitcoin Utopia is that ELECTRICITY AND GEAR cost me and others a lot more than those morons gather... And yet, they get the most RESPECT AND RECOGNITION in terms of credits.

If any projects get the funds from them, I still do not think that
THEY CAN AFFORD 1000 HIGH END GPU WORKSTATIONS EVERY THIRD YEAR AND THE ELECTRICITY BILL THAT COMES WITH IT!!!
3) Message boards : Projects : Bitcoin Utopia not science project
Message 55796
Posted 3 Sep 2014 by hangya2
Shrug. It's not as if the credits are worth anything, so until they do, it doesn't really matter to the powers that be.


Funny, how it went from "measuring" contributed flops to meaning nothing :D

Anyways, as Retvari Zoltan says on gpugrid:
http://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=3796&nowrap=true#37766

What if someone starts a BOINC project, which does the following:
1. gives 130 million BOINC credits for each USD its users donate for the project
2. keeps the 12% of the donated money for itself
3. sends the rest of the money for projects which apply for it
4. decreases the amount of BOINC credits awarded per USD on a regular basis

and also
http://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=3796&nowrap=true#37782

What is the purpose of the BitCoin utopia project? To generate and give funding to projects. (I do appreciate that.) It is a research? No. If it's not a research, then no BOINC credits should be awarded. BOINC credits shouldn't be awarded especially in exchange of money donations, as every project has a special place for their money donors on their homepages, still none of them gives BOINC credits for money. I my opinion that would be a shame if they would. Now the BitCoin Utopia project made that shame routine. Would it be okay, if the GPUGrid project gave Hypernova 426.8 billion credits for his 2500EUR donation? Does the BOINC community want to change its moral that way?


I would like to propose myself for handling ur money, plz plz plz donate
/With Luv, kind stranger
(I keep 25%, have many cats to feed)
4) Message boards : Projects : QMC News - Project Moving, URL Change
Message 49798
Posted 6 Jul 2013 by hangya2
A bit offtopic, but is this the same Martin who was connected to QuantumFire?
As in your post
http://boinc.berkeley.edu/dev/forum_thread.php?id=6284&postid=37773#37773...

hmm, any news on that?

thanks
5) Message boards : Questions and problems : "No task sent" regardless of settings
Message 44352
Posted 29 May 2012 by hangya2
Tue 29 May 2012 12:39:40 PM CEST | | ATI GPU 0: AMD Radeon HD 79x0 series (Tahiti) (CAL version 1.4.1720, 3072MB, 2837MB available, 7885 GFLOPS peak)
...
Tue 29 May 2012 06:21:41 PM CEST | Poem@Home | Requesting new tasks for ATI
Tue 29 May 2012 06:21:44 PM CEST | Poem@Home | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
Tue 29 May 2012 06:21:44 PM CEST | Poem@Home | No tasks sent

i just installed my 7950, running ubuntu 12.04, and boinc 7.0.25 "uninstalled" (run manually from directory).

for some reason i can not make it download work regardless of buffer settings... any advice?

the "Server status" link http://boinc.fzk.de/poem/server_status.php had available work, but seems unresponsive now...
6) Message boards : Projects : QuantumFIRE
Message 43598
Posted 19 Apr 2012 by hangya2
bump
7) Message boards : BOINC client : failed WU:s due dns error
Message 43095
Posted 17 Mar 2012 by hangya2

Freezes are normally due to hardware trouble, be it faulty RAM, an overheating computer (dust!) or other malformations.

nonono, I use kingston ECC memory, also me and computer brush teeth together and such, so no dust :) (only the boinc gui froze for a time)

Which project's tasks is this with?
Can you give links to tasks with the computation error?

I run POEM and WCG. POEM did no seem to have many problems, but WCG did, alas, I do not know how to hardlink to my WU:s in the WCG account. Many WU:s for WCG ended with computation error, and some of the subprojects had so many download errors lately, that barely any WU:s finished.

But, here is an unbelievable situation, I just found out about it.
The realtek network driver used by default in Ubuntu 11.10 (and some other) linux distros is faulty; i had to downgrade to an older version...
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1865436&page=3
some quotes from that thread:

The strange thing with kernel 3.0 and r8169 is, that sometimes it works, but most of the time, it doesnt.


@martin1969, it is not an Ubuntu problem, the problem is the r8169 driver in the Linux kernel. It affects many, if not all, distros. It has been on bug reports for several years. Why it is never fixed is beyond me.

Soooo, if the developers feel bored, and want to replicate my problems, just get hold of any board with realtek network adapter and driver r8169, and start crunching :D
8) Message boards : BOINC client : failed WU:s due dns error
Message 43083
Posted 17 Mar 2012 by hangya2
I was running BOINC 7.xx, but this is true for any version.

For some reason, the internet connectione in my area has disturbances from now and then; the connection times out often, and there are short outages.

In these situations the boinc client starts the WU:s, runs them for some time, then ends with "computation error".
If i try to click on any button under one of these "outages", a message window says something on the lines of "communicating with the boinc client", and everything just freezez for some time. And then there may or may not be computation error.

These last weeks, many many hours of work has been wasted in computation error.

Some time ago, more than 200 days, it was pointed out to me that this was a known bug, that may require redesign of the "heartbeat" of BOINC or whatnot...

Are there plans to fix this?

(ps. english is my third language out of five, so do not complain, I am not Shakespeare :) )
9) Message boards : Projects : Resources wasted on Primegrid project?
Message 39565
Posted 10 Aug 2011 by hangya2
well, i apologize for the hurt feelings I seem to cause...

let me explain: i have never lived in a country where i spoke my native language, thus i can "fluently" speak 3 and understand 2 more... i can not understand how the sentence "dude, i am educated, dont pull rethorics on me :D" can hurt anyone; it is just a phrase, intended as a pun; while true, it also holds a contradiction... it does not imply my superiority, nor does it imply that you are a "dude". i simply felt that, while i know, dimmly, of some usages of number theory, i still find your view of the field optimistic, in contrast to our more immediate needs - and that is the topic of this thread.

i can not delete this account, so I ask the moderator AGELESS to ban me, but as long as i am cited, i will attempt to clarify...

as a side note, the word "crap", that i used in a post below to describe the collatz project, does not hold such a derogatory meaning, as it seems to in english, in any other language i know of...
10) Message boards : Projects : Resources wasted on Primegrid project?
Message 39506
Posted 8 Aug 2011 by hangya2
"Science, technology and engineering rely heavily on math. Prime numbers are a part of math and we have no idea where research into primes will take us and what it might enable us to do."
dude, i am educated, dont pull rethorics on me :D

point is, the way i see it, that the ratio of resources for number_theory+astronomy vs more mundane sciences do indicate a waste...

"If we allow population to grow to the point where all our forest are gone and all land dwelling species are gone and the land is covered from sea to sea with people standing shoulder to shoulder..."
- endless breeding is not the probable way... the number of descendants do not increase as function of longevity and quality_of_life, or am i missing something? look at sweden, or some other developed european countries, where the immigrants make up the population increase... also russia, romania, hungary where the population is declining lalely...

seems to me, tha people who breed the most are:
religious: no condoms and such
disaster areas: africa
cultural problems: china, india...

we need science and technology to more efficiently fix problems that we meet or cause...

also, assume we are contacted and are asked for help by aliens:
aliens: comrades, we have a pain in our venerable a****
we: well, let uss show u these prime numbers, now...
11) Message boards : Projects : Resources wasted on Primegrid project?
Message 39502
Posted 7 Aug 2011 by hangya2
the thoughts on humanity is a respons to Dagorath, below.
"There's a lot of different ways to look at that. Some people think there's too damn many people on the planet already and that if we continue to mitigate natural population checks (by keeping people alive longer) we'll wipe out all the other species which will wipe us out too."

we are, we consume, we pollute, wipe out species and so forth... only technology will get us out of this. prime numbers will probably help, but will not be a principal component of our solutions, i feel... or not?

12) Message boards : Projects : Resources wasted on Primegrid project?
Message 39449
Posted 4 Aug 2011 by hangya2
let me cite Hamming "The purpose of computing is insight, not numbers."
(i am an EE dropout, with some math background)

yes, resources are wasted, especially on projects connected to number theory...

my own point is that if there will be a need for a large prime number, say, with 14839793256739 digits, the computers will be more efficient in that time, so it will take a fraction of the energy wasted today to get thet result...
as an other exemple, take the collatz project... it may be that i have missunderstood the project, but having a large amount of positive results is not proof of the theorem, so why waste megawatts on this kind of crap? where is the insight?

astronomical projects fail in my own eyes for several reasons... one is that I do not see that the insights, if any at all, we get by all the computations are deeper than what scientist say with help of telescopes...

projects i personally consider worthy are those that study structural problems that may leed to new theory or usable applications, such as protein folding and solid state physics in general...

as for humanity, i think like this: if a species comes over a certain intellectual treshold, so that it can explicitly model and eventually modify itself and its environment, it steps outside of evolution and, in some sense*, ouside nature... i also think that the only thing that will slow the negative effects is knowledge, science and technology... the faster we get out of the shit we stand in, the better...


Copyright © 2026 University of California.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.