1)
Message boards :
BOINC client :
Linux intall
(Message 1255)
Posted 28 Nov 2005 by ksnash Post: I can't install on my RedHat 9, what is wrong ? Red hat 9 is starting to be a little old. The latest open version is Fedora core 4. The farther away from current distribution the more likely an error might occur. First thing is to download again. I haven't looked to see if they have impemented MD5 checking. If the MD5 number is there check it to see if your download came correctly. |
2)
Message boards :
BOINC client :
BOINC on Campus computers
(Message 1253)
Posted 28 Nov 2005 by ksnash Post: While I was getting a new hard drive to replace the one that died and before the power supply went. I was running an earlier version of boinc using Knoppix off a windows share. I don't remember seeing a signifigant difference from normal time. The whole program gets put into memory and it usually writes to file every two minutes. I was running just CPDN and setiathome at the time. |
3)
Message boards :
BOINC client :
Resource share not regarded when requesting new work?
(Message 1252)
Posted 28 Nov 2005 by ksnash Post: I don't know how the scheduer decides how much in cache is enough. There is no way to control it. I would like to have at least 3 days in cache with CPDN, Einstein and Setiathome and having resource share of 10, 10, 4, which is approxiamtely 1 wu per day, which should be: one CPDN, 3 einstein and 3 setiathome. What I get is einstein will download 15. Setiathome will download 17. Recently I only have the one CPDN like I am supposed to. I get the impression the the scheduler is trying to inch forward until it fails. The computer is fast enough that it can handle that much work and I didn't have to use it until recently. |
4)
Message boards :
API :
Right forum
(Message 1088)
Posted 25 Nov 2005 by ksnash Post: I started to try and translate the c api into Java API. Somethings like fft8g were easy to translate. Others with a global swi variable are going to be a pain. |
5)
Message boards :
BOINC client :
Ranting about SETi Classic-> SETI/BOINC transfer
(Message 1087)
Posted 25 Nov 2005 by ksnash Post: Hi, There were two forms you could go to. one went to old style Boinc attachment and a new one that is supposed to work with passwords. |
6)
Message boards :
BOINC client :
Doing it the hard way
(Message 1086)
Posted 25 Nov 2005 by ksnash Post: I am trying to translate the C code into Java code. I have mostly been doing Java work recently. I thought it might be a way to see how everything interacts and just to try it. If it ever gets close to working, Is there a place to put the new Java Api? A couple of the files have been easy to translate and compile with no problems. The fun part will be putting in the global variables. Right now I have to find a swi instance. Since it is probably slower I wonder if Java would give 40 credits/wu? |
7)
Message boards :
BOINC Manager :
Improvement
(Message 1023)
Posted 23 Nov 2005 by ksnash Post: Can the downloaded exe files be ran without any other native code loaded from where they are? |
8)
Message boards :
BOINC Manager :
Improvement
(Message 991)
Posted 22 Nov 2005 by ksnash Post: EDF is not an error state. At the minimum what would make me happy is the ability to turn off the deadline withing two connect rates. It would look like it was working properly. |
9)
Message boards :
BOINC Manager :
Improvement
(Message 990)
Posted 22 Nov 2005 by ksnash Post: EDF is not an error state. SCheduler is not running in normal mode letting projects run. It says it has downloaded too much. It has noticed it created an error condition. It has too fix the situation that caused an error, too many work units. Therefore the scheduler is operating in an error mode. If scheduler was properly scheduling workunits, it should have proper amount of download for the time given and rarely have to fix itself. A proper setting should nopt cause error mode. It is a visible bad looking design. With a usefull setting, and a usefull setting missing, it is in a software error mode. |
10)
Message boards :
BOINC Manager :
Improvement
(Message 973)
Posted 19 Nov 2005 by ksnash Post: Can we please put a switch in to turn off the default scheduler. I like round robin better. To facilitate the ease of management for experienced users, Have a scheduling page that has a per project cache setting and project time to run. The time to run can be broken into two types run full length round robin or timed round robin. full length round robin would run the full time given per day for project. timed round robin could run project share * quanta. I do not like the scheduler constantly running in an error state. I do not like when the scheduler prevents the running of a project or exclusively running one project for weeks. It would stop a majority of the questions that are mentioned on board. Why can't I run xxxx right now. or Why is xxxx the only thing running. |
Copyright © 2024 University of California.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.