41)
Message boards :
Questions and problems :
boinc "box" with DCLinux
(Message 42073)
Posted 14 Jan 2012 by whynot Post:
It's old-stable. This February lenny is off security-support.
It's squeeze what's bearing 6.10.58. The boinc of lenny is 6.2.14
Some believe it would be easier to just build it yourself. You (not *you*, but you, who's building) have to learn anyway. |
42)
Message boards :
Questions and problems :
Possibility of Tax Deductions for Donating Computing Resources to BOINC Projects...??
(Message 42072)
Posted 14 Jan 2012 by whynot Post:
When I was practicing that Other Religion I'd seen Google among contributors. Things could have gone FUBAR since then. And I've never seen Google mention it was couting F@H.
Sure it is,.. No, it's possible to achieve that goal. *You* have to bribe... No, forget it, you have to contribute to some lawmakers upcoming elections. And they will do anything you want. |
43)
Message boards :
BOINC client :
Being able to switch off high priority feature of BOINC
(Message 41773)
Posted 24 Dec 2011 by whynot Post:
A long time ago I was made into GNU GPL cult (v3 for now), so sharing is inevitable. Although I can die before. |
44)
Message boards :
BOINC client :
Being able to switch off high priority feature of BOINC
(Message 41689)
Posted 17 Dec 2011 by whynot Post:
It's up to four hours, as a matter of fact.
I see no reason. You asked for example, there it is. OTOH, I think such feature being provided would make things even worse. OTOOH, the behaviour described in the example makes problem for me (although, I don't think it's a bug of any kind; It's just a way it is). As of my problem I'm going to solve it (and bunch of others); But excuse my arrogance, I'm going to do it my way.
Good. Now admit that boinc doesn't need you to fight for it. |
45)
Message boards :
Projects :
News on Project Outages
(Message 41588)
Posted 11 Dec 2011 by whynot Post: primaboinca is on the move to some unknown equipment. Hopefully, that will fix longstanding issue of the data server running out of space. That move is planned about 2012 Jan 1. It's unclear what's going to happen at the date (either data is going to migrate or migration will be over). Fabio, we are watching you. Meanwhile, old server is still operational. That means: new work isn't generated; timeouted WUs are re-issued; those are collected when eventually server would have some space. Don't ask, we got used to it. |
46)
Message boards :
BOINC client :
Being able to switch off high priority feature of BOINC
(Message 41563)
Posted 10 Dec 2011 by whynot Post:
I can. Although my issue was somewhat orthogonal. Just last Thursday (no, not "The Last Thursday") I'd babysat a client on three cores. Buffer is set to one day. However, for 12 hours or such client had kept buffer at something like 17Ksec (instead of 86Ksec). My installation is somewhat weird, I understand that. I have to give network for client each four hours (via simple cron-job). Twice I suggested client to go for WUs, but in spite of having three WUs only (and one of them with estimated time some 200sec) client ignored network completely. Until one core would have been left with no WUs at all nothing could force client to get more. So, my wish would be a button with nine red letters engraved on it: GTFWUs NOW OTOH, it's clear to me, any toggle that can force client to do something screws things even more. |
47)
Message boards :
Questions and problems :
Difference between web and client configuration
(Message 41464)
Posted 3 Dec 2011 by whynot Post:
From my observations, those setting propagate just like CPID does. I suppose limitations of CPID propagation apply here too. p.s. Those really interested (anyone?) would just look in the code. I'm off. |
48)
Message boards :
Questions and problems :
Does BOINC run better on Windows compared to Linux?
(Message 41125)
Posted 12 Nov 2011 by whynot Post:
Here is a nearby thread where FDF experiences problems with boinc mis-detecting user's activity. He runs bubuntu. Probably, bubuntu doesn't count as GNU/Linux anymore anyway. |
49)
Message boards :
Questions and problems :
can I change the date format in my event log ?
(Message 40997)
Posted 5 Nov 2011 by whynot Post: Yup boinc@orphan:~$ boinccmd --run_benchmarks ; sleep 45s ; tail stdoutdae.txt ; date 05-Nov-2011 18:58:29 [ABC@home] Starting abc_sieve_wu_04856387_0 05-Nov-2011 18:58:29 [ABC@home] Starting task abc_sieve_wu_04856387_0 using abc-sieve version 210 05-Nov-2011 18:59:00 [---] Running CPU benchmarks 05-Nov-2011 18:59:00 [---] Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks 05-Nov-2011 18:59:00 [---] Running CPU benchmarks 05-Nov-2011 18:59:31 [---] Benchmark results: 05-Nov-2011 18:59:31 [---] Number of CPUs: 1 05-Nov-2011 18:59:31 [---] 1316 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 05-Nov-2011 18:59:31 [---] 3945 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU 05-Nov-2011 18:59:32 [---] Resuming computation Sat Nov 5 20:59:45 EET 2011 Please note, that doesn't affect special boinc account. Only client is affected. |
50)
Message boards :
Questions and problems :
can I change the date format in my event log ?
(Message 40884)
Posted 29 Oct 2011 by whynot Post:
After some experiments, I've discovered that's whatever interface to client in use what localizes time (deadlines are in UTC all the way). |
51)
Message boards :
Questions and problems :
can I change the date format in my event log ?
(Message 40779)
Posted 22 Oct 2011 by whynot Post: But, that would make system time to be UTC. That will be very inconvenient. For those using real operating systems here comes the recipe. You should set TZ environment variable to empty value (or any unparsable value, tzset(3) has more) for boinc-client process. For debian (and nasty derivates), first stop the client; then add this line: export TZ='' somewhere in /etc/default/boinc-client file; then start again. Don't edit with client running -- time doesn't like dirty jokes. Users of other real operating systems probably should find more suitable way. I've just checked. Time in logs is UTC now. However deadlines of already present WUs aren't (I've moved time three hours back). You probably shouldn't do that under heavy load. |
52)
Message boards :
BOINC client :
Client task scheduling
(Message 40606)
Posted 8 Oct 2011 by whynot Post:
Does it mean that client has some paranormal wisdom about WU availabitility in future? Or not? I'm confused. And a bit of observation on FIFO. Before PG challenges I nomorework every project attached except SZTAKI that has four week deadlines. At a challenge start I suspend it and WUs are finished eventually after challenge end. This time, three days before the Equinox SZTAKI stops distributing work, so I've resumed ABC in order to keep cores busy. ABC has two week deadlines, WOO-RLLs are quite time consuming, thus I decided that as soon as I see that started WU doesn't finish before the challenge end I can safely resume ABC. So, within 48 hours before bottom deadline a client has three cores and three days of work. What could possibly go wrong? The client starts to empty the queue from the end. That was scary. Within eight hours before the top deadline three hours of work weren't even touched. Those three hours were finished and uploaded, however they weren't reported. I had to manualy report them two minutes after deadline. Hopefully they weren't sent to someone in that time. Shortly, I fail to see any FIFO. |
53)
Message boards :
Questions and problems :
Is there a record of BOINC transfers?
(Message 40604)
Posted 8 Oct 2011 by whynot Post: Those running real operating systems need no web converters {19436:17} [0:0]% perl -wle 'print scalar localtime 86400 * shift' 14982 Sat Jan 8 02:00:00 2011 |
54)
Message boards :
BOINC client :
Client task scheduling
(Message 40502)
Posted 1 Oct 2011 by whynot Post:
May I hear more about 'interesting order', please? |
55)
Message boards :
Questions and problems :
Boinc running on Android (Help)
(Message 38988)
Posted 16 Jul 2011 by whynot Post: The code you're talking about is dead. Nothing unusual. |
56)
Message boards :
Questions and problems :
Error for a newby
(Message 38858)
Posted 9 Jul 2011 by whynot Post: Sorry, I've used boinc from many times but now I've installed ubuntu and I'm go on with bonic it's all ok but sometimes I've a calculation error with primegride project and this message: First, if primegrid application errored you, you should discuss it with primegrid stuff (AFAIK they are on vacation now, beware). However, be prepared to present more information about that presumed error. Honestly, what you show here has nothing to do with this.
When /etc/init.d/boinc-client (that's an initialization script) has reached its maintanance steps the process number 2171 (it was boinc client, I suppose) had already gone. More diagnostics is in /var/lib/boinc-client/std{out,err}dae.txt logs, but in /var/log/syslog And last, but least, if you problems running stock boinc client in bubuntu bothers you then you should install from here |
57)
Message boards :
Questions and problems :
and now for something completely different.
(Message 38544)
Posted 18 Jun 2011 by whynot Post: I presume you've messed concepts. What you're talking about is an 'estimated CPU time'. And upon attach it's unkonwn to boinc at all. boinc requests amount of work in seconds (based on your preferences). Then project server ships as many WUs that would be for the time requested (based on how it was configured, and that out of your hands completely). Configure your boinc to request minmal amount of work, decrease cache. That's what you could do, but better don't mess with boinc. What you should check is 'report deadline'. If WUs can't finish with that time, then you clearly have a problem. Shortly: let boinc do its thing. |
58)
Message boards :
Questions and problems :
system getting hacked after install of boinc
(Message 38543)
Posted 18 Jun 2011 by whynot Post:
And that really could be a way in. Since many distributions configure sudo(1) to allow the user that installed (UID=1000, you know) to get privileges without authentication (matter of darn friendliness) then such malicious application can do anything. Everything becomes that scary these days. |
59)
Message boards :
Questions and problems :
GUI RPC requests from Hewlet Packard?
(Message 37505)
Posted 16 Apr 2011 by whynot Post: Networking doesn't work this way. If the host (with those suspicious connections) has no outgouing connections to those IP addresses, then your router must not let them in your network at all. That how NAT works. But those connections are present. I believe, that some equipment on your network spits on your ethernet broken frames. That equipment, most probably, is either dieing or is broken out-of-the-box (the latter happens too, trust me). By accident, only boinc exhibits that noise; however, that doesn't mean that only boinc suffers that noise. I'd experienced something like this myself (dieing ethernet card). I suggest you join some forum, IRC channel, newsgroup, whatever else that has somehting to do with networking and your operating system. I hope, regulars there could ask right questions and point to right tools that could help to find answers. |
60)
Message boards :
Questions and problems :
Is it feasable to develop BOINC for android or other cellphone OS?
(Message 37378)
Posted 2 Apr 2011 by whynot Post: Any. Just plug in power supply. |
Copyright © 2024 University of California.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.