Message boards : Projects : Quakecatcher
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 4 Mar 20 Posts: 1 |
Running my first WU, which I estimate will take about 20 days to complete. Just wondering if there's any point at all running QC without a sensor? It runs - but will it tell them anything? Thanks in advance. PS - I am such a newbie there that I am not allowed to post. So here it must be. |
Send message Joined: 25 Nov 05 Posts: 1654 |
There's no point at all to running without a sensor. All the project does is check an attached sensor to look for sudden vibrations/movement, which may mean an earthquake in the location of the sensor. And each "task" runs for 24 hours, then a new one is started. Yours is probably giving that long run time, because all it is doing is looking for the sensor. |
Send message Joined: 28 Jun 10 Posts: 2704 |
Running my first WU, which I estimate will take about 20 days to complete. Just wondering if there's any point at all running QC without a sensor? It runs - but will it tell them anything? Thanks in advance. Not sure if it runs on Android but most mobile phones have sensors as do a few laptops. |
Send message Joined: 25 Nov 05 Posts: 1654 |
The long run time means that the program can't find the sensor. Back when I was running this project, there were only a few sensor locations checked by the program, and it was for certain laptops, and 3 different external sensors. I don't know what it's like now that a different university, with different people, have taken over. |
Send message Joined: 8 Nov 19 Posts: 718 |
I think singleboard computers like the raspberry pi , or arduino can be included in the compatible hardware. There are GPIO locations to connect a sensor to. Quake catcher and radioactivity I wouldn't run, unless you have the sensor. Otherwise all it does, is send a zero file back at the end. |
Send message Joined: 14 Jun 20 Posts: 1 |
I created the project back in '07 - unfortunately it's been "dead as a doornail" for years. I'm surprised they still have the servers running or allow workunits etc. It just turned into an "academic publicity stunt" unfortunately - with no proper plans to shutdown or even tell users. I'm sure they'll claim it's "for educational purposes" now or some other drivel. At one point a postdoc who did zilch on the project scammed the National Science Foundation to start a company basically ripping off the project ideas etc. It really shows the worst of academic politics. |
Copyright © 2024 University of California.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.