GFLOPs of GPUs - Listing

Message boards : GPUs : GFLOPs of GPUs - Listing
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile Horst Luening

Send message
Joined: 17 Jul 15
Posts: 21
Germany
Message 65785 - Posted: 4 Dec 2015, 14:12:21 UTC

I am benchmarking a few GPUs in my machines. I would be happy, if we all could list the GFLOP readout of our graphic cards, as they appear in the logfile.

Here I go with the first ones:
------------------------------
GeForce 210 67 GFLOPs
Intel HD4400 with i3-CPU (2.9GHz) 105 GFLOPS
NVIDIA GT610 156 GFLOPs
NVIDIA GTX970 4087 GFLOPs
Kind Regards,
Horst
ID: 65785 · Report as offensive
Profile Richie

Send message
Joined: 2 Jul 14
Posts: 186
Finland
Message 65787 - Posted: 4 Dec 2015, 15:29:39 UTC

There is some info also:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nvidia_graphics_processing_units

"Processing Power" there gives at least a hint about the relative differences between cards.
ID: 65787 · Report as offensive
Profile Horst Luening

Send message
Joined: 17 Jul 15
Posts: 21
Germany
Message 65819 - Posted: 5 Dec 2015, 7:21:04 UTC

Thx for the list. I tried in the past to compare these figures with the data I have. Sometimes they fit, sometimes not.

------------------------------
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 66 GFLOPs
Kind Regards,
Horst
ID: 65819 · Report as offensive
dan1

Send message
Joined: 6 Dec 15
Posts: 1
United States
Message 65849 - Posted: 6 Dec 2015, 16:43:52 UTC - in response to Message 65785.  

Is your GFLOPS rating for single precision operations or double precision?
ID: 65849 · Report as offensive
Profile Horst Luening

Send message
Joined: 17 Jul 15
Posts: 21
Germany
Message 65859 - Posted: 7 Dec 2015, 15:25:38 UTC - in response to Message 65849.  

I think they are single precision.
Kind Regards,
Horst
ID: 65859 · Report as offensive
Profile Horst Luening

Send message
Joined: 17 Jul 15
Posts: 21
Germany
Message 65860 - Posted: 7 Dec 2015, 15:28:12 UTC

New Graphics:
------------------------------
GeForce GTX 750 Ti 1472 GFLOPs
Intel HD 4600 with i7-CPU (3.4GHz) 56 GFLOPs
Kind Regards,
Horst
ID: 65860 · Report as offensive
Kc0oog

Send message
Joined: 13 May 15
Posts: 4
United States
Message 65901 - Posted: 8 Dec 2015, 22:31:42 UTC
Last modified: 8 Dec 2015, 22:33:14 UTC

(sapphire r9 270x 2gb)(aib)CAL: ATI GPU 0: AMD Radeon HD 7850/7870 series (Pitcairn)6848 GFLOPS peak)
(hd7660 igpu)(a10-5800k)CAL: ATI GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7500/7600/8500/8600 series (Devastator) (CAL version 1.4.1848, 512MB 2054 GFLOPS peak)
ID: 65901 · Report as offensive
Profile Horst Luening

Send message
Joined: 17 Jul 15
Posts: 21
Germany
Message 65932 - Posted: 10 Dec 2015, 8:19:43 UTC

New Graphics:
------------------------------
AMD/ATI R7 240 (1GB DDR3) 312 GFLOPs

This is a silent card without fan. Probably the fastest 0dB GPU
Kind Regards,
Horst
ID: 65932 · Report as offensive
boboviz
Help desk expert

Send message
Joined: 12 Feb 11
Posts: 415
Italy
Message 65935 - Posted: 10 Dec 2015, 10:01:02 UTC - in response to Message 65932.  

AMD R7 260x OpenCL: AMD/ATI GPU 0: Bonaire, 2048MB available, 1120 GFLOPS peak.
ID: 65935 · Report as offensive
boboviz
Help desk expert

Send message
Joined: 12 Feb 11
Posts: 415
Italy
Message 65949 - Posted: 10 Dec 2015, 15:40:22 UTC - in response to Message 65901.  

(sapphire r9 270x 2gb)(aib)CAL: ATI GPU 0: AMD Radeon HD 7850/7870 series (Pitcairn)6848 GFLOPS peak)


6848 Gflops seems to be strange for a 270x.
A R9 Fury makes 7168 GFlops (wiki)
ID: 65949 · Report as offensive
Profile Horst Luening

Send message
Joined: 17 Jul 15
Posts: 21
Germany
Message 66057 - Posted: 12 Dec 2015, 12:33:45 UTC

New Graphics:
------------------------------
AMD R9 380X 4096MB DDR5 2534 GFLOPS
Kind Regards,
Horst
ID: 66057 · Report as offensive
Profile Agentb
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 May 15
Posts: 265
United Kingdom
Message 66058 - Posted: 12 Dec 2015, 13:07:27 UTC - in response to Message 65785.  

XFX HD7990

OpenCL: AMD/ATI GPU 0: Tahiti (driver version 1702.3 (VM), device version OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (1702.3), 2987MB, 2987MB available, 2688 GFLOPS peak)
OpenCL: AMD/ATI GPU 1: Tahiti (driver version 1702.3 (VM), device version OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (1702.3), 3035MB, 3035MB available, 2688 GFLOPS peak)
ID: 66058 · Report as offensive
Kc0oog

Send message
Joined: 13 May 15
Posts: 4
United States
Message 66081 - Posted: 14 Dec 2015, 1:33:50 UTC - in response to Message 65949.  

please help me figure out why boinc reports the card this way and will repost more accurate results...been at this long time...never had this kinda "power" before(pre 1999)
ID: 66081 · Report as offensive
Profile Richie

Send message
Joined: 2 Jul 14
Posts: 186
Finland
Message 66117 - Posted: 14 Dec 2015, 23:29:32 UTC

GeForce GTX 960 (driver version 359.12, CUDA version 7.5, compute capability 5.2, 2048MB, 1634MB available, 2566 GFLOPS peak)
GeForce GTX 960 (driver version 359.12, CUDA version 7.5, compute capability 5.2, 2048MB, 1634MB available, 2644 GFLOPS peak)

GeForce GTX 760 (driver version 359.12, CUDA version 7.5, compute capability 3.0, 2048MB, 1663MB available, 2650 GFLOPS peak)
GeForce GTX 760 (driver version 359.12, CUDA version 7.5, compute capability 3.0, 2048MB, 1663MB available, 2439 GFLOPS peak)

GeForce GTX 670 (driver version 359.12, CUDA version 7.5, compute capability 3.0, 2048MB, 1659MB available, 2634 GFLOPS peak)
GeForce GTX 670 (driver version 359.12, CUDA version 7.5, compute capability 3.0, 2048MB, 1659MB available, 2845 GFLOPS peak)

GeForce GTX 780 (driver version 347.88, CUDA version 7.0, compute capability 3.5, 3072MB, 2838MB available, 4636 GFLOPS peak)

** Ps. Underclocking the cards or running them at stock speed doesn't affect the results. I wonder where BOINC gets those values.
ID: 66117 · Report as offensive
Profile xixou

Send message
Joined: 28 Dec 15
Posts: 33
Belgium
Message 66452 - Posted: 28 Dec 2015, 15:51:14 UTC

28-12-15 16:08:41 | | CUDA: NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GTX TITAN X (driver version 361.43, CUDA version 8.0, compute capability 5.2, 4096MB, 4025MB available, 8479 GFLOPS peak)
28-12-15 16:08:41 | | OpenCL: NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GTX TITAN X (driver version 361.43, device version OpenCL 1.2 CUDA, 12288MB, 4025MB available, 8479 GFLOPS peak)
28-12-15 16:08:41 | | OpenCL: AMD/ATI GPU 0: Hawaii (driver version 1912.5 (VM), device version OpenCL 2.0 AMD-APP (1912.5), 4096MB, 4096MB available, 3200 GFLOPS peak)
ID: 66452 · Report as offensive
Profile Agentb
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 May 15
Posts: 265
United Kingdom
Message 66458 - Posted: 28 Dec 2015, 20:11:01 UTC - in response to Message 66452.  

28-12-15 16:08:41 | | OpenCL: AMD/ATI GPU 0: Hawaii (driver version 1912.5 (VM), device version OpenCL 2.0 AMD-APP (1912.5), 4096MB, 4096MB available, 3200 GFLOPS peak)


@xixou hi, what model AMD GPU ?
ID: 66458 · Report as offensive
Profile xixou

Send message
Joined: 28 Dec 15
Posts: 33
Belgium
Message 66487 - Posted: 29 Dec 2015, 16:26:48 UTC - in response to Message 66458.  

28-12-15 16:08:41 | | OpenCL: AMD/ATI GPU 0: Hawaii (driver version 1912.5 (VM), device version OpenCL 2.0 AMD-APP (1912.5), 4096MB, 4096MB available, 3200 GFLOPS peak)


@xixou hi, what model AMD GPU ?


R9 290
ID: 66487 · Report as offensive
GeneAZ

Send message
Joined: 28 Jun 14
Posts: 27
United States
Message 66519 - Posted: 30 Dec 2015, 5:52:43 UTC

Nvidia GTX 650 (driver 352.41) Peak 813 GFLOPS
Compute capability 3.0; CUDA 6.0; 1024 MB available
Max. performance mode at 1058 Mhz clock.
ID: 66519 · Report as offensive
Profile xixou

Send message
Joined: 28 Dec 15
Posts: 33
Belgium
Message 66572 - Posted: 1 Jan 2016, 14:23:59 UTC

Is Fury X supported ?
ID: 66572 · Report as offensive
Profile Agentb
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 May 15
Posts: 265
United Kingdom
Message 66690 - Posted: 8 Jan 2016, 20:37:58 UTC - in response to Message 66572.  

Is Fury X supported ?


Partially.

GCN 1.2 GPUs seem to have problem and it seems to be a driver related issue when running more than one task at a time.

see this thread for example.
ID: 66690 · Report as offensive
1 · 2 · Next

Message boards : GPUs : GFLOPs of GPUs - Listing

Copyright © 2024 University of California.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.