Message boards :
Questions and problems :
read_global_prefs_override
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 16 Oct 06 Posts: 4 |
Hi all, I'm just upgraded to 6.2.14 and found out that it is not longer possible to use only one CPU on a dual core windows system. With 5.10.45 I could change the global_prefs_override.xml to set the max_cpus to 1. I did this in the morning to reduce the boinc load on my system and set it to 2 in the evening so that Boinc got full CPU load over night. Then I used the command boinccmd --read_global_prefs_override to apply these changes and that worked fine. Now with the new version I see that the file has been read but the number of used CPUs didn't change. What has been changed here? legolas13 |
Send message Joined: 16 Oct 06 Posts: 4 |
Hi again, I found it out. the attribute <max_cpus>2</max_cpus> has changed to <max_ncpus_pct>100.000000</max_ncpus_pct> with this my mechanism to reduce the used CPUs works fine again. |
Send message Joined: 19 Jan 07 Posts: 1179 |
I wonder if in this transitional period where projects have yet not adopted the % parm in their website profiles, if there is a mechanism to translate the old to new on the client side? Nope, the preference change was done without any thought about backwards compatibility or userfriendliness. Without any thought, really. |
Send message Joined: 29 Oct 07 Posts: 13 |
I wonder if in this transitional period where projects have yet not adopted the % parm in their website profiles, if there is a mechanism to translate the old to new on the client side? Sadly, I agree with this comment. I may be wrong but I think users would want to specify the exact number of CPUs to use, rather than a fraction. Also, 75% of 4 cores is 3, but what is 75% of 2 cores? Which way does it round off? But, for me I'll just get to know the values I want and live with it. |
Send message Joined: 19 Jan 07 Posts: 1179 |
I may be wrong but I think users would want to specify the exact number of CPUs to use, rather than a fraction. I'm not getting in the discussion of whether it's better to have a fraction or an exact CPU count. What I disagree with is with *changing it* from the way it was before, without providing any "migration path". |
Copyright © 2024 University of California.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.